Mentor Graphics ModelSim SE-64 10.7| 755.6 mb Mentor, a Siemens business, has unveiled ModelSim 10.7, is unified debug and simulation.
Additional Information: Installation. the latest ModelSim PE Student Edition. Current Release: 10.4a Please note: You must be logged in as the administrator on the computer you are installing ModelSim PE Student Edition. Install the Software. After the file downloads completely, double-click on the.exe file to begin the installation process. You must agree to the Mentor Graphics End-User License agreement during installation to continue. Complete the License Request Form.
At the end of the installation process, select Finish and a browser window will open with the License Request form Please note - clicking on an existing license request link from your browser bookmark or from a link posted on the web - WILL NOT WORK. Complete the all of the form fields with attention to the email address field and submit the license request form. Once your request has been received the ModelSim PE Student Edition license file will be generated, matched to your host computer and will be emailed to you along with license installation instructions.
Please note - the license.dat file email could get reside in your Spam or Junk mail folder. If you do not receive the email within a few minutes, check your spam folder or email provider. If you do not receive your license.dat file email - You will need to rerun the installation sequence and request a new license file.
This is an automated process. We are unable to manually generate a license file for you. Important Information about your Installation. License files are valid only for the current installation of the software on the computer on which the software is installed. If you need to re-install the software on a computer, you are encouraged to download the latest release and corresponding license file. If for any reason you need a new license file - you must go through the entire process of download, installation and license request.
Additional Information: Student Resources ModelSim Product Demo You will learn the basics about simulation and how to simulate with projects. You will learn how to work with multiple libraries and debug with the Dataflow window and view simulation waveforms in the Wave window. Finally, you will analyze simulation results with Waveform Compare. Discussion Group Interact with other users and join the ModelSim Student Edition Discussion Group Digital Systems Textbook Written for an advanced-level course in digital systems design, DIGITAL SYSTEMS DESIGN USING VHDL integrates the use of the industry-standard hardware description language VHDL into the digital design process.
Following a review of basic concepts of logic design, the author introduces the basics of VHDL, and then incorporates more coverage of advanced VHDL topics. Rather than simply teach VHDL as a programming language, this book emphasizes the practical use of VHDL in the digital design process.
On 16:07, Weng Tianxiang wrote:. It is the latest INFORMATION of GHDL: The current version of GHDL does not contain any graphical viewer: you cannot see signal waves. You can still check the behavior of your design with a test bench. Moreover, the current version can produce a GHW, VCD or FST files which can be viewed with a waveform viewer, such as GtkWave. GHDL aims at implementing VHDL as defined by IEEE 1076. It supports the 1987, 1993 and 2002 revisions and, partially, the latest, 2008.
PSL is also partially supported. This is really good as none of the restricted free commercial versions supports PSL. Several third party projects are supported: VUnit, OSVVM, cocotb (through the VPI interface),. Now I know why GHDL is not populous, the basic reason is it has no waveform viewer! Build-in waveform viewer, but I agree with you this is a major obstacle. The waveform display is the number one debugging window.
It doesn't matter if you design an AND gate or the latest billion gate machine learning chip the waveform window is always king. For this reason EDA vendors have added all sorts of enhancements such as virtual signals/functions, transaction display, analogue display, multiple panes, group/combine functions, scripting etc. GHW+Sigasi improves the situation but it is still not as smooth or capable as the free restricted Modelsim or ActiveHDL versions. But for a free version, it still has its values: Definitely, I hope GHDL will be the first simulator to fully support the 2018 standard. It can be used to correct all VHDL grammar errors, playing the same rule as Modelsim does. It can be used to test a pre-issued product playing the same rule as Modelsim does, but it should be faster than Modelsim PE or SE.
Why should it be faster? I give all kudos to Tristan (et al.) as he wrote an amazing piece of software but it is definitely not faster than Modelsim. I ran two of my test cases again to see if anything has changed and GHDL was still 6x slower than Modelsim 10.7c. This is no surprise as Mentor has an army of engineers trying to squeeze the last fs from the simulation time. Modelsim SE has been obsolete for at least 8 years (replaced by Questa). Hans www.ht-lab.com 3.
At least it provides files to communicate with third party software to view the waveform. I will be comfortable with this method: As an experienced VHDL designer, I spent most of time running Modelsim until an error showed up. The speed is very important factor to get all bugs discovered. It can be used to test a pre-issued product playing the same rule as Modelsim does, but it should be faster than Modelsim PE or SE.
Why should it be faster? I give all kudos to Tristan (et al.) as he wrote an amazing piece of software but it is definitely not faster than Modelsim. I ran two of my test cases again to see if anything has changed and GHDL was still 6x slower than Modelsim 10.7c.
This is no surprise as Mentor has an army of engineers trying to squeeze the last fs from the simulation time. Modelsim SE has been obsolete for at least 8 years (replaced by Questa). Hans www.ht-lab.com Hi Hans, I appreciate your sharing experiences with us. I desplayed Youtube 'Getting Started With VHDL on Windows (GHDL & GTKWave)' I asked one Modelsim seller who offers to sell Modelsim DE.
Do you have any experiences with different versions of Modelsim and their prices? It seems to me that buying a Modelsim perpetual use of PE, or other advanced version may be my best option. On 13:47, Weng Tianxiang wrote: 2. It can be used to test a pre-issued product playing the same rule as Modelsim does, but it should be faster than Modelsim PE or SE. Why should it be faster?
I give all kudos to Tristan (et al.) as he wrote an amazing piece of software but it is definitely not faster than Modelsim. I ran two of my test cases again to see if anything has changed and GHDL was still 6x slower than Modelsim 10.7c. This is no surprise as Mentor has an army of engineers trying to squeeze the last fs from the simulation time.
Modelsim SE has been obsolete for at least 8 years (replaced by Questa). Hans www.ht-lab.com Hi HansI appreciate your sharing experiences with us. I desplayed Youtube 'Getting Started With VHDL on Windows (GHDL & GTKWave)' Nice tutorial although I would forget about the VCD format as it is not well suited for VHDL.
There is e.g. No support for enumerated types (I suspect GTKwave will allow you to add them afterwards with some virtual functions). If you want to use GHDL use GHW+GTKWave together with Sigasi: I asked one Modelsim seller who offers to sell Modelsim DE.
Do you have any experiences with different versions of Modelsim and their prices? Have a look at this comparison chart: The main difference is that Modelsim DE will give you full support for PSL/SVA which is great for functional verification. You also get access to the FLI (VHDL C/C I/F) and full 64bits Windows support to name a few. If you don't need any of these just ask for Modelsim PE. It seems to me that buying a Modelsim perpetual use of PE, or other advanced version may be my best option.
If you need it for commercial work then yes Modelsim is a great product. For personal use it is too expensive.
Intel has a $1995 version (for Intel FPGA's only) but I think it is for 1 year only (non perpetual) and has lower performance than Modelsim. Good luck, Hans www.ht-lab.com Thank you. On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 6:52:58 AM UTC-5, HT-Lab wrote: On 16:07, Weng Tianxiang wrote:.
It is the latest INFORMATION of GHDL: The current version of GHDL does not contain any graphical viewer: you cannot see signal waves. You can still check the behavior of your design with a test bench. Moreover, the current version can produce a GHW, VCD or FST files which can be viewed with a waveform viewer, such as GtkWave. GHDL aims at implementing VHDL as defined by IEEE 1076.
It supports the 1987, 1993 and 2002 revisions and, partially, the latest, 2008. PSL is also partially supported. This is really good as none of the restricted free commercial versions supports PSL. Several third party projects are supported: VUnit, OSVVM, cocotb (through the VPI interface),. Now I know why GHDL is not populous, the basic reason is it has no waveform viewer! Build-in waveform viewer, but I agree with you this is a major obstacle.
The waveform display is the number one debugging window. It doesn't matter if you design an AND gate or the latest billion gate machine learning chip the waveform window is always king. For this reason EDA vendors have added all sorts of enhancements such as virtual signals/functions, transaction display, analogue display, multiple panes, group/combine functions, scripting etc. GHW+Sigasi improves the situation but it is still not as smooth or capable as the free restricted Modelsim or ActiveHDL versions.
But for a free version, it still has its values: Definitely, I hope GHDL will be the first simulator to fully support the 2018 standard. It can be used to correct all VHDL grammar errors, playing the same rule as Modelsim does. It can be used to test a pre-issued product playing the same rule as Modelsim does, but it should be faster than Modelsim PE or SE. Why should it be faster?
I give all kudos to Tristan (et al.) as he wrote an amazing piece of software but it is definitely not faster than Modelsim. I ran two of my test cases again to see if anything has changed and GHDL was still 6x slower than Modelsim 10.7c.
This is no surprise as Mentor has an army of engineers trying to squeeze the last fs from the simulation time. It could be faster than Modelsim because Modelsim is intentionally crippled unless you pay for the fastest version.
So if GHDL picks up the same sorts of speed enhancements as commercial packages it won't require that the higher speeds be enabled. Modelsim SE has been obsolete for at least 8 years (replaced by Questa). Personally I wouldn't know.
I use the ActiveHDL that comes free with Lattice tools. I gave up paying for this sort of software. I didn't feel I was getting anything for my money. Support is not good. It seems most support comes from the community, in both commercial and open source packages. So why pay for commercial stuff?
- Get 6 months of free supercharging - Tesla referral code. On 15:18, [email protected] wrote: On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 6:52:58 AM UTC-5, HT-Lab wrote:. Why should it be faster? I give all kudos to Tristan (et al.) as he wrote an amazing piece of software but it is definitely not faster than Modelsim. I ran two of my test cases again to see if anything has changed and GHDL was still 6x slower than Modelsim 10.7c. This is no surprise as Mentor has an army of engineers trying to squeeze the last fs from the simulation time. It could be faster than Modelsim because Modelsim is intentionally crippled unless you pay for the fastest version.
True, but Modelsim's OEM versions are about 40% of the speed of Modelsim which means they are still faster than GHDL (base on my limited testing). Of course this is true until you reach the instance limit in which case Modelsim OEM grinds to a halt. It would be great if GHDL was faster than Modelsim as for some of my designs I don't need to log any signals, just sockets I/O. So if GHDL picks up the same sorts of speed enhancements as commercial packages it won't require that the higher speeds be enabled. How can GHDL pick up the same sorts of speed enhancements?
I am sure all EDA vendors keep their optimisers a close secret. Modelsim SE has been obsolete for at least 8 years (replaced by Questa). Personally I wouldn't know. I use the ActiveHDL that comes free with Lattice tools. Right and that version is not crippled?
I gave up paying for this sort of software. I didn't feel I was getting anything for my money. Support is not good.
For you., doesn't mean it is bad for everybody. It seems most support comes from the community, in both commercial and open source packages. So why pay for commercial stuff? Because if you work on a commercial product and you find an issue you want to pick up the phone and get help immediately. They are required to help you as you are paying expensive maintenance, if they don't help you you switch products. Also for a complex product you can not rely on the free versions as they are too limited in their capabilities.
I guess you are happy with the free ActiveHDL version as your designs are not that large. Regards, Hans. Www.ht-lab.com Rick C. - Get 6 months of free supercharging - Tesla referral code -. On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 11:09:00 AM UTC-5, HT-Lab wrote: On 15:18, [email protected] wrote: On Sunday, December 23, 2018 at 6:52:58 AM UTC-5, HT-Lab wrote:. Why should it be faster? I give all kudos to Tristan (et al.) as he wrote an amazing piece of software but it is definitely not faster than Modelsim.
I ran two of my test cases again to see if anything has changed and GHDL was still 6x slower than Modelsim 10.7c. This is no surprise as Mentor has an army of engineers trying to squeeze the last fs from the simulation time.
![]()
It could be faster than Modelsim because Modelsim is intentionally crippled unless you pay for the fastest version. True, but Modelsim's OEM versions are about 40% of the speed of Modelsim which means they are still faster than GHDL (base on my limited testing). Of course this is true until you reach the instance limit in which case Modelsim OEM grinds to a halt. It would be great if GHDL was faster than Modelsim as for some of my designs I don't need to log any signals, just sockets I/O. So if GHDL picks up the same sorts of speed enhancements as commercial packages it won't require that the higher speeds be enabled.
How can GHDL pick up the same sorts of speed enhancements? I am sure all EDA vendors keep their optimisers a close secret.
Modelsim SE has been obsolete for at least 8 years (replaced by Questa). Personally I wouldn't know.
I use the ActiveHDL that comes free with Lattice tools. Right and that version is not crippled? I gave up paying for this sort of software. I didn't feel I was getting anything for my money. Support is not good. for you., doesn't mean it is bad for everybody. It seems most support comes from the community, in both commercial and open source packages.
So why pay for commercial stuff? Because if you work on a commercial product and you find an issue you want to pick up the phone and get help immediately. They are required to help you as you are paying expensive maintenance, if they don't help you you switch products. Also for a complex product you can not rely on the free versions as they are too limited in their capabilities. I guess you are happy with the free ActiveHDL version as your designs are not that large. My use of the free tools is post having paid for tools and gotten a lot less than I would have liked. What gets support is buying lots of chips, not support dollars.
Support dollars are chump change in the budget of the chip makers. Get 6 months of free supercharging - Tesla referral code.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |